Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Thermodynamic Processes and Forecasting in the Coupled Ocean-Ice Atmosphere System

Improving Arctic Ocean observations to support sea ice forecasts

As a consequence of rising global temperatures, areas with permanent sea ice in the Arctic Ocean are melting into seasonal, thinning ice patches. This high melt activity is causing an array of changes to ripple throughout the Arctic and are particularly dramatic in sea shelves such as those surrounding Alaska. With these changes rapidly affecting the Arctic, there is a great need to provide information that can keep pace, especially those that support hazard-mitigation, sustainability of resources, and maritime safety.

The Thermodynamics of Ocean-Ice Atmosphere System project aims to advance sea ice and Arctic weather prediction modeling by establishing observation technologies that will support related forecast modeling within and outside of NOAA. These efforts target the dynamic and thermodynamic processes that regulate the transformation of ice. Areas of research include (i) modeling representations of coupled system processes, (ii) the causes, consequences, and predictability of extreme events; and (iii) the energetic exchanges between sea ice and the atmosphere that is associated with cyclones and air mass advection.

FIGURE 1: 2m-Skin Temperature (Celsius) Finding: 2-4 degC bias in seasonal means. 2.6 Linkages between Arctic/sub-Arctic atmospheric transport and sea ice anomalies. Task Lead: Chris Cox (NOAA), Contributor: Paul McKinley (Hollings Scholar)

Previous slide
Next slide

Project Institution: Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL)

Partnerships: Earth System Research Labs (ESRL), PSL

Award Period: 01 October 2022 – 30 September 2023

Data Access

About MOSIAC Database

The Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) was an international research expedition to study the physical, chemical, and biological processes that coupled the Arctic atmosphere, sea ice, ocean, and ecosystem. 

During MOSAiC, Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL)  collected, transmitted, and hosted the following observations from multiple platforms: upwelling and downwelling shortwave and longwave radiation, meteorology, snow depth, surface skin temperature, geodetic information, 3d winds and gas concentrations (for eddy covariance calculations of turbulent latent and sensible heat flux), and snow conductive flux.

About AMOS Database

The Arctic Research Program and Physical Science Laboratory are conducting research using experimental observations made in collaboration with Navy. Working with the Naval Postgraduate School, the University of Washington, and NASA, a study is being conducted that identifies atmospheric subsidence as a mechanism for initiating sea ice melt and another that analyzes the freeze-up in the Beaufort Sea during former Typhoon Merbok in autumn 2022.

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023d). Met City meteorological and surface flux measurements (Level 2, processed), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2TM7227K

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023e) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #30 measurements (Level 2, processed), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2K649V1f

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023f) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #40 measurements (Level 2, processed), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A29P2W74F

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023g) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #50 measurements (Level 2, processed), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2251FM5R

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023h). Met City meteorological and surface flux measurements (Level 3, final), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2PV6B83F

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023i) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #30 measurements (Level 3, final), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2FF3M18K

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023j) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #40 measurements (Level 3, final), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A25X25F0P

Cox, C.J. et al. (inc M. Shupe, T. Uttal, S. Morris, O. Persson) (2023k) Atmospheric Surface Flux Station #50 measurements (Level 3, final), Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC), central Arctic, October 2019 – September 2020. Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2XD0R00S

Oehri, J. et al. (inc C. Cox) (2022), Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites. PANGEA Bundled Publication.
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.949792 
(*PART ONE)

Oehri, J. et al. (inc C. Cox) (2022), Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites. PANGEA Bundled Publication.
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.949764
(*PART TWO)

Oehri, J. et al. (inc C. Cox) (2022), Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites. PANGEA Bundled Publication.
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.949789
(*PART THREE)

Oehri, J. et al. (inc C. Cox) (2022), Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites. PANGEA Bundled Publication 
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.949791
(*PART FOUR)

Oehri, J. et al. (inc C. Cox) (2022), Harmonized in-situ observations of surface energy fluxes and environmental drivers at 64 Arctic vegetation and glacier sites. PANGEA Bundled Publication 
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.949737
(*PART FIVE)

Pirazzini, R., H. Henna-Reeta, M.D. Shupe, T. Uttal, C.J. Cox, D. Costa, P.O.G. Persson, and Z. Brasseur (2022), Upward and downward broadband shortwave and longwave irradiance and downward diffuse and direct solar partitioning during the MOSAiC expedition. PANGEA. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.952359

Shupe, M.D. (2022), ShupeTurner cloud microphysics product. ARM Mobile Facility (MOS) MOSAiC (Drifting Obs – Study of Arctic Climate). https://doi.org/10.5439/1871015

ArcticMET Dataset

MOSAiC Databse

Atmospheric Surface Flux Station (ASFS) #30

Atmospheric Surface Flux Station (ASFS) #40

Atmospheric Surface Flux Station (ASFS) #50

Featured Publication

Emerging Technologies For Observing the Arctic Ocean

September 9, 2022

Craig M. Lee , Michael DeGrandpre, John Guthrie, Victoria Hill, Ron Kwok, James Morison, Christopher J. Cox, Hanumant Singh, Timothy P. Stanton, and Jeremy Wilkinson 

Understanding and predicting Arctic change and its impacts on global climate requires broad, sustained observations of the atmosphere-ice-ocean system, yet technological and logistical challenges severely restrict the temporal and spatial scope of observing efforts. This paper reviews new platform and sensor developments, adaptations of mature technologies, and approaches for their use, placed within the framework of Arctic Ocean observing needs.

Image credit: Chris Cox

Publications & References

Calmer R., G. de Boer, J. Hamilton, D. Lawrence, M. Webster, N. Wright, M.D. Shupe, C. Cox, J. Cassano (2023) Perspectives on relationships between summertime surface albedo and melt pond fraction in the central Arctic Ocean from uncrewed aircraft systems, Elementa.
Access Link

Clemens-Sewall, D., C. Polashenski, M. M. Frey, C. J. Cox, M. A. Granskog, A. Macfarlane, S. W. Fons, J. Schmale, J. K. Hutchings, L. von Albedyll, D. Perovich (2023) Snow loss into leads in Arctic sea ice: Minimal in typical wintertime conditions, but high in exceptional conditions, Geophysical Research Letters 
Access Link

Heinemann, G., L. Schefczyk, S. Willmes, M.D. Shupe, (2022), Verification of regional climate model simulations of near-surface variables for the MOSAiC winter period. Elementa, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00033
Access Link

Herrmannsdorfer, L., M. Mueller, M.D. Shupe, and P. Rostosky, (2023), Surface temperature comparison of the Arctic winter MOSAiC observations, EFA5 reanalysis and MODIS satellite retrieval. Elementa, 11:1, https://doi/org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00085
Access Link

Huang, Y, P.C. Taylor, F.G. Rose, D.A. Rutan, M.D. Shupe, M. Webster, M.M. Smith (2022), Towards a more realistic representation of surface albedo in NASA CERES-derived surface radiative fluxes: a comparison with the MOSAiC field campaign. Elementa, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00013
Access Link

Jozef, G., R. Rauterkus, J.J. Cassano, B. Maronga, G. de Boer, S. Dahlke, and C. Cox, (2023a), Derivation and compilation of atmospheric boundary layer properties relating to temperature, wind, stability, moisture, and surface radiation budget over the central Arctic sea ice during MOSAiC. Earth System Science Data.
Access Link

Jozef, G., J. Cassano, S. Dahlke, M. Dice, C.J. Cox, and G. de Boer (2023b), An overview of the vertical structure of the atmospheric boundary layer in the Central Arctic during MOSAiC. Elementa, submitted.
Access Link

Jozef, G., J.J. Cassano, S. Dahlke, M. Dice, C.J. Cox, and G. de Boer, (2023c), Thermodynamic and kinematic drivers of atmospheric boundary layer stability in the central Arctic during MOSAiC, Elementa, submitted.
Access Link

Jung, J. and J. Wilson (with contributions from T. Uttal) (2022), Year of Polar Prediction – Achievements and Impacts. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7355088
Access Link

Kirbus, B., S. Tiedeck, A. Camplani, J. Chylik, S. Crewell, S. Dahlke, K. Ebell, I. Gorodetskaya, H. Griesche, D. Handorf, I. Hoeschel, M. Lauer, R. Neggers, J. Rueckert, M.D. Shupe, G. Spreen, A. Walbroel, M. Wendisch, A. Rinke (2023), Surface impacts and associated mechanisms of a moisture intrusion into the Arctic observed in mid-April 2020 during MOSAiC. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1147848
Access Link

Lee, C., M. DeGrandpre, J. Guthrie, V. Hill, R. Kwok, J. Morison, C. Cox, H. Singh, T. Stanton, J. Wilkinson (2022): Emerging technologies for observing the Arctic Ocean. Oceanography, 35(3-4), https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2022.127.
Access Link

Oehri et al. (inc S. Morris and C. Cox) (2022), Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic land surface energy budget, Nature Communications, 13, 6379, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34049-3
Access Link

Smith, M.M., B. Light, A. Macfarlane, D. Perovich, M.M. Holland, and M.D. Shupe, (2022), The sensitivity of the Arctic ice cover to surface scattering layers. Geophysical Research Letters. 49, e2022GL098349, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098349
Access Link

Wilson, J. et al. (inc T. Uttal) (2023), The YOPP Final Summit: Assessing past and forecasting future polar prediction research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 104(3), E660-E665, https://doi.org/10/1175/BAMS-D-22-0282.1
Access Link

Cox, C.J., M. Gallagher, M.D. Shupe, P.O.G. Persson, A. Solomon, C.W. Fairall, T. Ayers, B. Blomquist, I.M. Brooks, D. Costa, A. Grachev, D. Gottas, J. K. Hutchings, M. Kutchenreiter, J. Leach, S.M. Morris, V. Morris, J. Osborn, S. Pezoa, A. Preusser, L. Riihimaki, and T. Uttal (2023a), Continuous observations of the surface energy budget and meteorology over Arctic sea ice during MOSAiC, Nature Scientific Data.

Cox, C., A. Solomon, O. Persson, M. Shupe, M. Gallagher, V. Walden, M. Town, and D. Perovich (2023b), Resiliency of the sea ice to warming from early spring southerly advection. To be submitted, Geophys. Res. Lett.

Cox, C., Z. Lawrence, and S. Dahlke (2023c), Linkages between anomalous mid-April warming at MOSAiC and the evolution of the 2020 polar vortex. To be submitted, Elementa.

Day, J. et al. (inc T. Uttal, S. Morris) (in prep), The YOPP site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation. Earth System Dynamics.

Guy, H., I.M. Brooks, D.D. Turner, C.J. Cox, P.M. Rowe, M.D. Shupe, V.P. Walden, and R.R. Neely III (2023) Observations of fog-aerosol interactions over central Greenland, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, in review.

Intrieri, J., A. Solomon, C.J. Cox, O. Persson, G. de Boer, M. Hughes, A. Capatondi, and M. Shupe (2023) Evaluation of the NOAA Experimental Coupled Arctic Forecast System (CAFS), to be submitted, Frontiers

Morris, S.M. et al. (inc T. Uttal, C. Cox) (in prep) Special Observing Period (SOP) data for the Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP), Earth System Science Data, submitted.

Neff, W., M.D. Shupe, C.J. Cox, and M. Gallagher (2023) Heat waves, hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, and the melting of Greenland, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, in prep.

Rabe et al. (inc. C.J. Cox, M.D. Shupe, O. Persson) (2023) The MOSAiC Distributed Network: an integrated system of autonomous ice-tethered buoys for multidisciplinary atmosphere, snow, ice and ocean observations, Elementa, in prep.

Riihimaki et al. (inc. C. Cox) (2023) Ocean Surface Radiation Best Practices, Frontiers in Marine Science, in prep.

Sledd, A., M. Shupe, A. Solomon, C. Cox, D. Perovich, and R. Lei (2023), Snow thermal conductivity and conductive fluxes in the Central Arctic: estimates from observations and implications for models. Elementa, in prep.

Solomon, A., M. D. Shupe, G. Svensson, N. P. Barton, Y. Batrak, E. Bazile, J. J. Day, J. D. Doyle, H. P. Frank, S. Keeley, T. Remes, M. Tolstykh (2022), An evaluation of short-term forecasts of wintertime boundary-layer and surface energy balance statistics in the Central Arctic. Elementa, accepted.

Thielke, L., M. Huntemann, G. Spreen, C.J. Cox, V. Ludwig, and M.D. Shupe (2023), Differences in sensible heat exchange based on satellite sub-footprint variability. Thesis chapter, PhD Dissertation, University of Bremen.

Uttal, T. et al. (inc S. Morris, C. Cox) (2023) Merged Observatory Data Files (MODFs): An integrated research data product supporting process oriented investigation and diagnostics. Nature Scientific Data, submitted.

Cox, C. and A. Solomon (2023), Assessment of P8 using observations from Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska, NWS-EMC Couple Global Modelling WG, 1, February 2023, online.

Shupe, M. (2023) 2nd MOSAiC Conference Readout, OAR Arctic All-Hands Meeting, 10 March, 2023, online.

Arctic Mobile Observing System Website
Access Link

MOSAiC Data Policy Statement
Access Link